My mind has been overwhelmed lately by the continuing violence against women. After completing part four of Roberto Bolano's 2666, which chronicles the senseless murders of hundreds of young women in the town of Santa Theresa in Mexico, I am numb. Here in the United States, the media has focused within the past week on the murder of Yale student, Annie Le, who ironically was killed on the week in which she was to be married. The police have now arrested Ray Clark III, a lab person who cleans cages of the mice Annie and others work with for medical experimentation.
Today the discussion rests on the motives which would lead to this horrific event. On one side, we hear the police describe it as "workplace violence." They indicate perhaps there was an argument between the two individuals about the cleanliness of the cages. Women who are interviewed, however, tend to believe the murder is clearly related to the idea of anger, power, and violence against women. I tend to believe the latter theory as well.
In my personal life, I have witnessed and been a victim of violence against women both as a child and as an adult. In other writings I have documented my sexual abuse as a child. In the past year I have witnessed bullying and threatened violence against a friend of mine. I am always at a loss to explain the continuing violence. Is it simply that men are physically stronger for the most part and know they can win in a struggle? Are we failing to teach our young boys respect for girls as they grow into manhood? Are these men emasculated somehow in the workplace by competition with other men or women? Are we simply failing to teach ethics and morality any longer?
I have no answers, but like most all Americans today will continue to read and seek answers on how to win in this continuing war against women worldwide.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Armstrong's Case
This week's Newsweek contains an interesting article by Lisa Miller that basically reviews Karen Armstrong's nineteenth book entitled The Case for God. In the article there were two points that made me think about my past beliefs and my current ones. The first point Armstrong makes is that believers in the three major religions--Jewish, Christian, and Muslim-- are all capable of reading the Bible symbolically, rather than literally. If one does so, he or she is likely to realize there are multiple interpretations of the Word. The second point is that the Bible does not present just one revelation only in the far distant past but rather continuing revelations. I would like to consider these two points carefully since they are the reverse of my previous theological teaching.
The church in which I was a member for over fifty years always taught the one should interpret the Scriptures absolutely literally. The snake was a real one in Genesis, the donkey actually spoke in the Old Testament, and the whale actually swallowed a fellow named Jonah. As I grew older, however, and became an English major, I realized there were numerous verses in the Bible which we cannot take literally but symbolically. There are many, but a few examples will make the point: "I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out" (Luke 19:40); " . . . hide me under the shadow of thy wings" (Psalm 17:8); and "I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, . . ." (Revelation 13:1).
On the second point, likewise, I have been taught in the past there there was one revelation only and that the time for revelation ended with the completion of the Biblical Word. Yet, we realize that the Muslims base their religion on revelations from the prophet Mohammad and the Mormons base their faith on the prophet Joseph Smith.
Does God evolve His Word in a dynamic creative way today? If we believe in the power of the Holy Spirit to teach Truth to us, I have come to believe the Word is ever changing in its ability to speak to us in different ways. I do not believe, like our American Constitution, that it is a static document--but it is one that is constantly in motion to teach us new Truths daily.
The church in which I was a member for over fifty years always taught the one should interpret the Scriptures absolutely literally. The snake was a real one in Genesis, the donkey actually spoke in the Old Testament, and the whale actually swallowed a fellow named Jonah. As I grew older, however, and became an English major, I realized there were numerous verses in the Bible which we cannot take literally but symbolically. There are many, but a few examples will make the point: "I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out" (Luke 19:40); " . . . hide me under the shadow of thy wings" (Psalm 17:8); and "I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, . . ." (Revelation 13:1).
On the second point, likewise, I have been taught in the past there there was one revelation only and that the time for revelation ended with the completion of the Biblical Word. Yet, we realize that the Muslims base their religion on revelations from the prophet Mohammad and the Mormons base their faith on the prophet Joseph Smith.
Does God evolve His Word in a dynamic creative way today? If we believe in the power of the Holy Spirit to teach Truth to us, I have come to believe the Word is ever changing in its ability to speak to us in different ways. I do not believe, like our American Constitution, that it is a static document--but it is one that is constantly in motion to teach us new Truths daily.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Joining the Good Old Boys Club
The door to the historic house on Broadway opened on a beautiful fall-like evening in Little Rock. The host greeted us and commented on my husband's and my matching tie-died shirts. We were there for a celebration of our friend Matilda's 60th birthday. There was also recognition by the theme of the party of Woodstock. The beaded hairbands around my graying, but blond-highlighted hair, were tightening around my temples. I immediately pulled out of my purse a copy of the 1969-1970 yearbook from the University of Mississippi and showed a gathering group around me my husband's and my yearbook pictures. One of the group commented on my big hair back then, but the host immediately pointed out the paucity of women on the page. I looked again and then counted; I was one of eight women students on the page surrounded by thirty-seven men.
This year 2009 represents, as we all know, the 40th anniversary of both Woodstock and the landing on the moon. Therefore, all of us have been reflecting upon the momentous events going on in the late '60's like the assassination of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. combined with the Viet Nam War. I guess it is for this reason that many of us women are also reflecting, many years later, upon our status both culturally and professionally.
Statistics tell us that in 1969 women in graduate school represented just 41 percent of the student population. By 1999 the percentage had grown to 57 percent (a 178 percentage increase). In 1969, I had hardly awakened yet to the women's movement, but I now know that the late 1960's ushered in the feminist movement that would reach a crescendo by the middle of the next decade. At that time I, of course, had no idea of the great challenges that lay ahead of me as I sought to enroll in a doctoral program at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville only to be told I would likely do better to work for an Educational Specialist degree instead. I held my ground before "the deciders" (all male) and was admitted and was graduated five years later, doctoral degree in hand. I spent twenty-two years of my working career in a university in Northwest Arkansas (it was mostly very conservative regarding the role of women since most of the faculty were men and had wives who were homemakers). I became, however, the first woman Registrar and later the first woman chair of the English department.
Now that I have been retired for three years, I look back at those years and, even though quite difficult at times to navigate in a man's world, I am proud that I was one of the many women who were also joining the good old boys clubs throughout America.
This year 2009 represents, as we all know, the 40th anniversary of both Woodstock and the landing on the moon. Therefore, all of us have been reflecting upon the momentous events going on in the late '60's like the assassination of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. combined with the Viet Nam War. I guess it is for this reason that many of us women are also reflecting, many years later, upon our status both culturally and professionally.
Statistics tell us that in 1969 women in graduate school represented just 41 percent of the student population. By 1999 the percentage had grown to 57 percent (a 178 percentage increase). In 1969, I had hardly awakened yet to the women's movement, but I now know that the late 1960's ushered in the feminist movement that would reach a crescendo by the middle of the next decade. At that time I, of course, had no idea of the great challenges that lay ahead of me as I sought to enroll in a doctoral program at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville only to be told I would likely do better to work for an Educational Specialist degree instead. I held my ground before "the deciders" (all male) and was admitted and was graduated five years later, doctoral degree in hand. I spent twenty-two years of my working career in a university in Northwest Arkansas (it was mostly very conservative regarding the role of women since most of the faculty were men and had wives who were homemakers). I became, however, the first woman Registrar and later the first woman chair of the English department.
Now that I have been retired for three years, I look back at those years and, even though quite difficult at times to navigate in a man's world, I am proud that I was one of the many women who were also joining the good old boys clubs throughout America.
Friday, September 4, 2009
Mourning Edition
Just a few days after Ted Kennedy's death last week, NPR and other media outlets were already talking about his replacement in the U. S. Senate. Obviously, Kennedy's death came at a most inopportune time since August represented the final push for the Democrats to hold town meetings to promote health care reform. His death means that the Senate will not have the sixty votes needed to push through the health care agenda that Kennedy was promoting for most of his life.
Many of those interviewed about Kennedy's position indicated that decorum demanded at least a week was needed before one seriously broached the subject of his successor. Some were already urging that Kennedy's wife Vicki be chosen, certainly following a common precedent from the past. Some could not wait even a week, however, and have already indicated an interest in the position. Today on NPR we hear that Attorney General Martha Coakley is announcing her candidacy even if a Kennedy decides to run at a later date. My question is, "Doesn't Senator Kennedy deserve some respect in death without stepping all over each other in a bid to be elected to his position?" The mourning edition, or tradition, has hardly been honored. I am saddened by that.
Many of those interviewed about Kennedy's position indicated that decorum demanded at least a week was needed before one seriously broached the subject of his successor. Some were already urging that Kennedy's wife Vicki be chosen, certainly following a common precedent from the past. Some could not wait even a week, however, and have already indicated an interest in the position. Today on NPR we hear that Attorney General Martha Coakley is announcing her candidacy even if a Kennedy decides to run at a later date. My question is, "Doesn't Senator Kennedy deserve some respect in death without stepping all over each other in a bid to be elected to his position?" The mourning edition, or tradition, has hardly been honored. I am saddened by that.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
End of Life Issues
One of the best books I have read recently is the popular novel The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society co-written by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows. The setting takes place in the Channel Islands located between England and France just after World War II has ended. The residents had to live under German occupancy during the final months of the war, and their lives were in constant jeopardy if any of the rules of the enemy were broken. At one point in the novel, one of the key characters, Elizabeth, speaks of Matthew Arnold's poem Empodecles of Etna. The lines remind all of us of the importance of living life fully each day, "Is it so small a thing, To have enjoyed the sun, / To have lived light in the Spring, / To have thought, to have done; / To have advanced true friends, . . . ."
Many of us who are in our sixties and enjoying the retirement we have worked all our lives for have been bombarded in recent weeks with a lot of scare tactics relating to end of life issues. We hear that Medicare will be rationed, waits to see doctors will be lengthy, and perhaps nursing home care will be eliminated with the proposed Medicaid cuts. I guess at this point I am ambivalent on some of the issues. For example, my father-in-law is now ninety-two and living in an assisted living facility in Wichita. During the past twenty-five years, he has probably had just about every medical procedure that a human being can endure--all in an effort to extend his life forever. While I know doctors are committed to extending life, I wonder if we extend it far too long at times, especially when I think of my friend Connie who died of a brain tumor at age fifty. Upon diagnosis, the doctor gave her six months to live with no treatment; she died in five months after enduring massive radiation treatments. I ask myself, "Would her final months have been better with no radical treatment?"
As far as myself, I have already indicated to my family that I want no extended end of life treatments when a diagnosis comes that says my time on earth is ending. I hope to die with dignity, reflecting upon the wonderful memories of this life. As Arnold reminded us in his poem, I have enjoyed many wonderful vacations, I have raised my family in the spring of my life, I have considered many issues thoughtfully, I have worked over forty years, and I have dearly loved both family and friends. But . . . I don't want to cling to this life since, as a believer, I look forward to a future life.
Many of us who are in our sixties and enjoying the retirement we have worked all our lives for have been bombarded in recent weeks with a lot of scare tactics relating to end of life issues. We hear that Medicare will be rationed, waits to see doctors will be lengthy, and perhaps nursing home care will be eliminated with the proposed Medicaid cuts. I guess at this point I am ambivalent on some of the issues. For example, my father-in-law is now ninety-two and living in an assisted living facility in Wichita. During the past twenty-five years, he has probably had just about every medical procedure that a human being can endure--all in an effort to extend his life forever. While I know doctors are committed to extending life, I wonder if we extend it far too long at times, especially when I think of my friend Connie who died of a brain tumor at age fifty. Upon diagnosis, the doctor gave her six months to live with no treatment; she died in five months after enduring massive radiation treatments. I ask myself, "Would her final months have been better with no radical treatment?"
As far as myself, I have already indicated to my family that I want no extended end of life treatments when a diagnosis comes that says my time on earth is ending. I hope to die with dignity, reflecting upon the wonderful memories of this life. As Arnold reminded us in his poem, I have enjoyed many wonderful vacations, I have raised my family in the spring of my life, I have considered many issues thoughtfully, I have worked over forty years, and I have dearly loved both family and friends. But . . . I don't want to cling to this life since, as a believer, I look forward to a future life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
